Site BLOG PAGE🔎 SEARCH  Ξ INDEX  MAIN MENU  UP ONE LEVEL
 OJB's Web Site. Version 2.4. Blog Page.Location: entry997 blog owen2 
Blog

Add a Comment   Return to Previous Page

Too Safe

Entry 997, on 2009-04-26 at 22:00:11 (Rating 2, Politics)

A recent proposal to introduce more security for domestic flights in New Zealand doesn't seem to be getting much support from the public. Last year a crazed individual tried to hijack a minor domestic flight but I can't think of any other times that the security of a domestic flight was a concern.

Of course everyone would like assurances of increased security for air travel but you don't get anything positive without some negatives. Having negatives doesn't mean the new actions aren't worth having, we simply have to look at the balance of factors.

Most people seem to think that the new security already in place for international flights is too great a price to pay (in convenience and cost) for the extra safety it provides - at least that's the conclusion I see from anecdotal evidence. Surely domestic flights are even less in need of added security - the public support for this was shown by a recent Herald poll where over 70% thought extra security was unnecessary.

I agree. In fact, I think we try far too hard to protect people from the hazards of modern life in general. Maybe if I was the victim of one of those hazards: a terrorist attack, hijacking, car accident caused by speed or alcohol, etc, I might feel differently but I don't think so.

There are some things worse than having our freedom affected by external problems (like terrorists) - for example restrictions on our freedom from within our own culture - like the type of laws which try to protect us from every little potential hazard.

On the other hand few people would want no security at all, so it is all a matter of balance again. I'm sure the politicians who introduce new restrictive laws think they are doing the right thing and achieving the right balance but I think most of them are wrong. There is such a thing as "too safe".


Comment 1 (2005) by Jim on 2009-04-27 at 21:10:22:

This is now twice in a week I agree with you. Maybe you are finally starting to see sense. People need to be responsible for themselves and the state should back off!


You can leave comments about this entry using this form.

Enter your name (optional):
Enter your email address (optional):
Enter the number shown here:number
Enter the comment:

To add a comment: enter a name and email (optional), type the number shown, enter a comment, click Add.
Note that you can leave the name blank if you want to remain anonymous.
Enter your email address to receive notifications of replies and updates to this entry.
The comment should appear immediately because the authorisation system is currently inactive.



I do podcasts too! You can listen to my latest podcast, here: OJB's Podcast 2026-04-14 How Far is that Star?: How would we really know how big the universe is? Or subscribe to my podcast RSS feed, on my RSS Feeds page.

If you're not sure what to view from the thousands of pages on my site, here are some suggestions: My Latest Airshow Report (photos and movies from Warbirds Over Wanaka, 2026), My Favourite Wines and Beers (tasting notes for some of my favourites), An Interesting Astronomical Observation (learn a bit about astronomy from these observing notes), See Some Photos (A short rail journey through the Taieri Gorge), Read Some Mac Tips (Learn about how to use your Mac, and fix some problems).


Latest Site News and Notifications (Desktop): You are currently viewing OJB's web site, version 2.4 which has some major changes, and possibly errors! Please report any problems to ojb@mac.com.

 Site ©2026 by OJBRSS FeedMicrosoft Free ZoneMade & Served on Mac 
Site Features: Blog RSS Feeds Podcasts Feedback Log24 Apr 2026. Hits: 1,001,425,439
Description: Blog PageLogged: nothingLoad Timer: 219ms